Anthony Albanese should prioritize listening to young people rather than prohibiting them from using social media, as it plays a pivotal role in shaping the experiences and perspectives of Generation Z individuals in Australia. Born into a world where social media has always been a part of their existence, young people have come to rely on these platforms for connection, information, and activism.
The recent proposal by the Albanese government to ban minors under the age of 16 from using social media platforms has sparked significant debate and controversy. While the intention behind the legislation is to protect young people from harmful content and promote their mental well-being, it fails to take into account the positive aspects of social media and the potential it holds for youth engagement and education.
Research has shown that a large percentage of teenagers and children rely on social media platforms for news and information about the world around them. This highlights the importance of these spaces in shaping young minds and empowering them to make informed decisions about their future. Rather than banning young people from using social media, the focus should be on teaching them how to navigate these platforms responsibly and critically.
Social media companies also have a responsibility to ensure that their platforms are safe and conducive to positive interactions. The proposed “digital duty of care” is a step in the right direction, as it places the onus on these companies to prioritize the mental health and well-being of their users. However, it is essential that this duty of care extends beyond just mental health to encompass broader issues that affect young people, such as climate change.
It is concerning that the same government that rejects a climate duty of care initiative put forth by young people is now seeking to implement restrictions on social media use. This highlights the need for greater consultation and engagement with youth voices in policymaking processes. Young people have unique experiences and perspectives that must be considered when crafting policies that affect them directly.
Social media has also emerged as a powerful platform for youth activism, allowing young people to connect with like-minded individuals, educate themselves on global issues, and mobilize for positive change. As a youth activist myself, I have witnessed firsthand the impact of social media in amplifying youth voices and driving social change.
By engaging with young people and involving them in decision-making processes, we can ensure that policies are inclusive and reflective of their needs and aspirations. Social media should be seen as an opportunity to empower young people, rather than as a threat to their well-being.
In conclusion, Anthony Albanese should prioritize listening to young people and engaging with them in meaningful ways rather than imposing restrictions on their use of social media. By working together to create a safe and respectful online environment, we can foster the growth and development of all individuals, both now and in the future. Let us embrace the potential of social media as a tool for positive change and collective action, rather than a barrier to youth empowerment.
